At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I'm not. Neither am I surprised at their desire to publicise it either.
Most cycling enthusiasts only drive because they have to, and if they were able to get around without ever needing a car, would sell it and live...
Hmmm - robotic squirrels. I can't see any problem with them inevitably turning against their creators....
I had been disappointed not to find Giro highlights on Quest, just seen an ad for it on DMax. Happy now.
What's that crap on the left, been in auckland. Really makes those white lines and foldable plastic wands look like a 3 year thought of the idea
She will not get many votes for her pledges or policies. Most of the votes will be simply because she wears a blue rosette. The bollocks she spouts...
Replies much appreciated.
You mean like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkCpA91NqBw
Thanks to locals for reviews. And obviously the people who got this through!...
Welcome, hope it works!