At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I wonder whether, should there be a trial of a cyclist, that there will be a requirement stipulating all jurors should be cyclists? After all a...
Chapeau to Chris Boardman. The Telegraph and Daily Mail agenda is a travesty. I really hope all cyclists ignore these publications just as the...
That's nothing - I did a 10,000 mile ride once in only a few hours...
Does anybody else feel like crying sometimes
Bloody cyclists eh?
Well at least you can make sure that the bikes are still there by glancing up.
How much would a MotoGP bike cost? Presumably quite a lot too.
How many times now has Strava announced that they're finally going to do something about the integrity of the leaderboards, but then actually done...
Charlie State there: "Well, I suppose the arguement is though, that... oh yeah, there isn't really an arguement is there".
Changed to SRAM AXS (Force and Rival) about 5 years ago. When it works it is great but I have had 2 rear mechs, one front mech and a spider power...