Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Yorkshire villages told they could be waiting "hundreds of years" for safe cycle route to town

Council responds to petition for safe active travel route into Richmond

North Yorkshire villagers hoping for safe cycle routes who had been encouraged by news of an extra £3.9m in highways funding have been left disappointed after being told they could face a wait of “hundreds of years” for cycle infrastructure.

In May, North Yorkshire was allocated £52.6m by the Department for Transport (DfT) to improve roads, pathways and cycle routes.

Learning of the news, residents of Gilling and surrounding villages – who have been asking for a safe pedestrian and cycle route into Richmond for decades – contacted the council to request a feasibility study.

Gilling resident Janette Povey told Richmondshire Today that after riding into town during lockdown, she had been dreading a return to normal traffic levels, but thought they, “might be in with a chance.”

She said: “If you look at how many holes there are in the stone walls you will have an idea of just how dangerous it is for all road users. The bridge at Oliver has been repaired countless times.”

A cycling and walking path would provide a link to schools and businesses in Richmond, she argued.

Responding to a petition from residents of the area calling for such a route this week, Councillor John Weighell said that over 300 active travel schemes had been considered as part of the council’s recent bid for emergency active travel funding.

He said that officers had concluded the Richmond scheme would have “benefits for some people” but that it was not a high priority.

“Three hundred schemes at that sort of level are probably going to take hundreds of years to be able to be funded,” he said.

“It is the ones with the greatest benefits, with the greatest use, that will actually come to the top of the pile unfortunately.

“To build these things together and to look for other kinds of funding, even for individual schemes, through lottery funding and so on is probably the only way forward because funding for that sort of thing from county budgets would not be realistic for many many many years.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

14 comments

Avatar
Bungle_52 | 3 years ago
4 likes

How about prosecuting drivers for intimidating, careles or dangerous driving and then fine them an amount that will deter them in future. That should not cost much and may actually make money in the long run

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
9 likes

And to add insult to injury, the government spending review just cut the amount of funding for cycling and walking. 

"Golden age of cycling."  Just as true as everything else Boris the Liar says.

Avatar
Sriracha | 3 years ago
9 likes

They already have perfectly safe routes, just need to remove the motor vehicles from them. Or, if that is too drastic, install average speed cameras set to 20mph at frequent intervals. How much can it cost? (Probably self-funding - ker-ching!)

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 3 years ago
6 likes

North Yorkshire can find money for extra road lanes at J47 of the A1M. I wonder how much that is costing? Hundreds of thousands, at a minmum.

When it comes to active travel, which should be the priority, Councillors suggest lottery funding. It would be funny were it not so tragic.

Avatar
Zebulebu replied to HarrogateSpa | 3 years ago
3 likes
HarrogateSpa wrote:

North Yorkshire can find money for extra road lanes at J47 of the A1M. I wonder how much that is costing? Hundreds of thousands, at a minmum.

When it comes to active travel, which should be the priority, Councillors suggest lottery funding. It would be funny were it not so tragic.

Try 7.7 million and counting...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.harrogateadvertiser.co.uk/news/transpor...

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to Zebulebu | 3 years ago
0 likes

Wow. North Yorkshire is in the running for Most Outdated Local Authority in England.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to HarrogateSpa | 3 years ago
0 likes

HarrogateSpa wrote:

Wow. North Yorkshire is in the running for Most Outdated Local Authority in England.

Now that's a race with a hundred contenders!  Maybe we could have a competition, along the lines of the olympics, with bronze, pewter and brass medals.

Avatar
Spangly Shiny replied to HarrogateSpa | 3 years ago
1 like

To be fair the A1M is funded directly by central government so that North Yorkshire have no say in the decisions or cost of the upkeep and modification.
This is why once you are away from the motorway network and the A roads the condition of the roads deteriorates significantly.  These are the roads the councils are responsible for.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to Spangly Shiny | 3 years ago
1 like

But this is money to upgrade the approaches to the A1M at J47, and as such it comes from North Yorkshire's transport budget - as the story zebulebu linked to makes clear.

Avatar
Spangly Shiny replied to HarrogateSpa | 3 years ago
0 likes

The article did not state the funding source, only that North Yorkshire council approved of the plans.

Avatar
brooksby | 3 years ago
3 likes

“hundreds of years”? - humanity will probably be extinct by then...

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
2 likes

brooksby wrote:

“hundreds of years”? - humanity will probably be extinct by then...

Well we might be if we keep all our breeding pairs on just the one planet

Avatar
Organon replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
0 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

brooksby wrote:

“hundreds of years”? - humanity will probably be extinct by then...

Well we might be if we keep all our breeding pairs on just the one planet

The Golden Path is our only choice. 

Avatar
alexls replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
5 likes

Well, the motor car certainly will be.

Latest Comments