Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Councillors urge Tory-led council to “get its act together so people can get out of cars” after series of “failed and abandoned” cycling schemes

Despite active travel infrastructure being labelled as “absolutely terrible”, a Conservative councillor maintained that the council hadn’t done a “bad job”

North Yorkshire Council has been told by Lib Dem and Green councillors to “step its game up” and “get its act together”, after a number of cycling schemes in Harrogate have seen delays and been abandoned, while many others have been implemented poorly. However, a councillor from the Conservative party, currently in the majority, has defended its actions and deemed that it hasn’t done a “bad job”.

Last month, the council’s senior transport planning officer Alexander Kay, who’s previously worked with cycling and walking charity Sustrans, unveiled a list of priority cycling schemes in Harrogate and Knaresborough.

However, funding bids have been rejected by the government for new cycle paths on Knaresborough Road and Victoria Avenue given the council's track record of delivering them, while the rest have met with deliberations and pushback.

The council has received sharp criticisms, with Harrogate District Cycle Action (HDCA) previously accusing them of “failing our children” and lacking in delivering any “significant cycling infrastructure for nine years”.

> Campaigners accuse council of “failing our children” after failing to deliver “significant cycling infrastructure for nine years”

Other controversial projects for the council have included the widely-criticised Otley Road cycle lane, scrapping a Low Traffic Neighbourhood on Beech Grove and deciding against creating a one-way system on Oatlands Drive.

The council's flagship active travel scheme, the £11.2m Harrogate Station Gateway, after being thrown into "jeopardy" following a legal challenge on the scheme, now has also been drastically scaled back following opposition from local businesses, with only a small section of Station Parade now set to include a cycle lane.

At a meeting of Harrogate and Knaresborough councillors, Liberal Democrat Councillor Matt Walker criticised the state of the cycle infrastructure in the area, saying: “To improve things you have to acknowledge there’s a problem. Active travel is absolutely terrible.

“Roads are gridlocked and full of potholes, buses are missed all the time between Harrogate and Knaresborough. We have to make improvements and the council needs to step its game up.

“It needs to get its act together so people can get out of cars and get around in a quick and environmentally-friendly way.”

Councillor Arnold Warneken from Greens added: “The frustration of people who want to cycle in Harrogate and Knaresborough isn’t being taken seriously.”

> Council scraps £500,000 Harrogate cycle lane expansions… even though majority support plans

In 2019, the council’s predecessor, North Yorkshire County Council had undertaken a massive survey which showed there was an appetite for improving walking and cycling infrastructure in the town so people are incentivised to leave their cars at home.

Otley Road cycle lane (via Twitter, Harrogate Cycle Action)

Otley Road cycle lane (via Twitter, Harrogate Cycle Action)

And then again in a survey last year, a majority of the respondents from the area were in favour of the active travel schemes in West Harrogate, including the Otley Road and Beech Grove schemes, however the council decided to jump through hoops and lump in those who said they had “no preference” together with those who were against it, skewing the responses against the schemes.

HDCA expressed their frustration and said that the council had “effectively abandoned active travel”. Similar feelings were also echoed by Lib Dem Councillor Philip Broadbank, who said: “I get frustrated with talks and plans and various things we spend time preparing [regarding cycling] yet year-in-year-out nothing happens.”

However, Councillor John Mann (Conservative – Oatlands and Pannal) defended the council and said it “hadn’t done a bad job” on active travel in his constituency. He said: “They’ve installed numerous cycle lanes, several 20mph zones, and school streets.

“The gateway scheme has not been without teething problems and it’s progressing. We shouldn’t be too hard on the highways team. The bigger picture is difficult on financing and funds. Costs of construction projects have gone up enormously and inflation is huge.”

> Campaigners blast “hugely disappointing” decision to abandon “failed” cycling schemes, four years on from hosting world championships

The failure to build meaningful cycling infrastructure in Harrogate comes after the town played host to the 2019 UCI road world championships, and even the Tour de France in 2014, with the former being somewhat unpopular with locals due to road closures — similar to last year’s ‘super’ world championships in Glasgow.

Questions have also been raised on the legacy of those two events and the impact on people who want to ride bikes daily for commuting or leisure in the area. In October 2022, we reported that one of the proposals made by the council in an active travel consultation was none other than an unsegregated, 1.3-metre-wide cycle lane situated against the flow of traffic, which the HDCA unceremoniously referred to as a “murder strip” and “dangerous”, with no benefits for active travel.

The group said: “Cycling south could well be worse than now, because the carriageway would effectively be narrowed by the cycle lane. You’d be stuck between the parked cars and the cycle lane, potentially with impatient drivers behind, harassing you or close-passing you.

“In our view, it is unprofessional of Area 6 to put forward a so-called active travel scheme that in fact has zero benefit for active travel. If they went ahead with Option 2, it would be because they wanted to look as though they were doing something, while actually doing nothing of value.”

Adwitiya joined road.cc in 2023 as a news writer after graduating with a masters in journalism from Cardiff University. His dissertation focused on active travel, which soon threw him into the deep end of covering everything related to the two-wheeled tool, and now cycling is as big a part of his life as guitars and football. He has previously covered local and national politics for Voice Wales, and also likes to writes about science, tech and the environment, if he can find the time. Living right next to the Taff trail in the Welsh capital, you can find him trying to tackle the brutal climbs in the valleys.

Add new comment

5 comments

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 1 month ago
3 likes

Councillor John Mann's contention that N Yorkshire Council has 'installed numerous cycle lanes' seems to me to be completely untrue.

As for 20mph zones, there have been no new ones in recent years to my knowledge. There is a single School Street, for which a parents' campaign is entirely responsible, despite the extreme reluctance of NYC officers.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to HarrogateSpa | 1 month ago
2 likes

This was our response to the cycling priorities.

In principle, it's a good idea. The way it should work is:

  • scheme gets to the top of the list > scheme is funded and delivered > move on to the next one

The way it actually doesn't work in N Yorkshire is:

  • scheme gets to the top of the list > scheme is abandoned or diluted to the point of meaninglessness > move on to the next one

The shaded yellow area on the map is the bit of the network they should have delivered but have failed to deliver.

There may be the odd good officer at the council, but in the context of the Council Executive and senior management, they just can't deliver anything meaningful.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 1 month ago
10 likes

However, a councillor from the Conservative party, currently in the majority, has defended its actions and deemed that it hasn’t done a “bad job”.

Of course they haven't done a bad job, from the point of view of drivers and no-one else, and the tories are the party of drivers.

........the council decided to jump through hoops and lump in those who said they had “no preference” together with those who were against it.......

Case proved, they only care about drivers.

 

Avatar
brooksby | 1 month ago
9 likes

Quote:

the council decided to jump through hoops and lump in those who said they had “no preference” together with those who were against it, skewing the responses against the schemes.

Surely if they had decided to think like that then they ought to have added the 'no preference' to both sides (ie. 'in favour' / 'opposed')?  Why, it almost looks as if they had made their minds up and just wanted to massage the numbers so as to support their opinion…

Avatar
levestane replied to brooksby | 1 month ago
0 likes

Maybe this is the way votes should be counted at the next election, Cons. vs the rest.

Latest Comments