Bike brands Canyon and Cervélo have reached an amicable settlement in their legal dispute regarding the Maximus seat tube patent. Cervélo is allowed to continue manufacturing its frames using the familiar seat tube design and in return Canyon gets the right to use certain Cervélo patents.
Canyon’s European patent refers to a seat tube with a special load-bearing design which is characteristically flat on the driveside, creating clearance for a front mech and chainrings. The German manufacturer argued that Cervélo’s R3, R3SL and RS frames violated this patent.
The European Patent Office had declared the Maximus seat tube fully patentable, although it had demanded Canyon adjust its claim. It is patented in nine European countries, and corresponding patents have been granted in the USA and China.
The legal action is now settled although the Cervélo patents that Canyon are permitted to use have not been made public and neither side will comment further on the arrangement.
“We’re happy this matter is resolved, that’s good news for both companies and for consumers,” said Gerard Vroomen, co-founder of Cervélo.
Roman Arnold, chief executive of Canyon, expressed his satisfaction as well.
“After the long lasting lawsuit both sides can once again concentrate on what they can do best: build high class, innovative and trendsetting bicycles,” he said.
Canyon’s marketing description of the Maximus Seat tube goes like this: “Narrow at the top, elliptical at the bottom and flattened on one side: The patented Maximus seat tube allows maximum stiffness of the rear triangle for sprints thanks to the wider contact area of the hollow section bottom bracket shell. A front derailleur can be easily mounted thanks to the flattened right side, and the tapered tube which becomes narrower towards the top and the VCLS Stays allows for better damping characteristics despite the extreme stiffness of the rear triangle.”
Until you can show othewise, I would suggest that riding a bike in the manner in question is no more "profoundly selfish" than any other legitimate...
Yeah, saw that one when trawling the news page. Strange that the Beeb open this article up to commenting, when so few other news articles are....
I think it's reasonable to say that everyone on the UK roads has extensive experience with traffic doing circa 30mph.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/23-fascinating-facts-about-the-number-twentythree-6262624.html
Compromise - in favour of the status quo e.g. the vast numbers with cars - will no doubt occur....
Well the problem there is having motorists in the tall grass verges!...
Can't seem to find their full list and their own site doesn't seem to make a big play of it oddly. It's in their newsletter - that also seems to...
You might also argue that that the group as a whole were in part responsible.
The Labour-run council's leader addressed the axing of the more specific transport role by saying they are "creating a new cabinet portfolio...
It's not the whole story though. Reduced profit may also reflect increased investment in the business e.g. factory / equipment / research /...