Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

All cyclists must adhere to 20mph speed limits during time trials in Britain – as governing body cites safety concerns and risk of causing “public outrage”

New guidance issued by Cycling Time Trials also aims to prevent riders gaining an “unfair advantage”, and says that any course with a 20mph section should be avoided if a suitable alternative is available

All cyclists taking part in time trials in Britain will be forced to slow down and adhere to the speed limit while racing through 20mph zones, the national governing body for time trialling in England, Scotland, and Wales has announced.

In new guidance published on Tuesday evening, which described 20mph speed limits and time trials as generally “incompatible”, Cycling Time Trials (CTT) also stipulated that any course with a lengthy 20mph section should not be used if a viable alternative is available, due to concerns over safety for participants and other road users, along with the risk of causing “public outrage” which, CTT says, could put the future of time trialling in Britain in jeopardy.

However, CTT’s latest guidance – which seeks to clarify the body’s stance on the widespread implementation of 20mph speed limits throughout the UK – also suggests that time trial courses which feature 20mph zones can still go ahead if a variety of conditions are met.

These exceptions will apply to courses with very short 20mph sections where riders are unlikely to exceed the speed limit in any case (such as during hill climbs or approaching a roundabout), during road closures, and if the demise of a course due to a prolonged 20mph section would lead to “a serious loss to time trialling in that area”.

In that final case, time triallists will be under strict instructions to ride at no more than 20mph during those sections, a rule CTT describes as an “overriding principle” which aims to prevent riders from gaining an “unfair advantage” by ‘breaking’ the speed limit, thereby nullifying time trialling’s long-standing reputation as the ‘race of truth’.

“20 mph limits and time trials are incompatible”

This latest announcement from CTT comes three months after the governing body first mooted the potential loss, or at least necessary modification, of some time trial courses following the introduction of a default 20mph speed limit across Wales, which raised concerns from members in both Wales and England that the road safety measures could usher in the demise of Britain’s historic time trialling scene.

20mph sign (CC licensed by EdinburghGreens via Flickr)

> Do cyclists have to stick to the speed limit?

In the UK, cyclists do not share the same legal obligation as motorists to stick to speed limits, and cannot be charged with an offence of excess speed. However, in a letter sent to its districts in November, CTT urged its members to “ignore any such suggestion” from “some websites [that] state speed limits do not apply to cyclists”.

In this week’s guidance, clarifying the body’s rules on the approval of courses and the “restrictions upon riders who take part in them”, CTT doubled down on its commitment to ensuring riders participating in its events adhere to speed limits and other rules of the road.

“All courses which will be used in 2024 must always have an up-to-date risk assessment,” the guidance for districts, organisers, and riders says. “If there is a 20mph limit now on any part of an approved course or the proposal for a course is a new one, the District must treat safety as it first priority and make an decision after weighing all the relevant issues.

“Generally, 20 mph limits and time trials are incompatible. Most riders travel between 20 and 30mph. Riding at that speed is capable of causing public outrage and danger to riders and other road users who will not be expecting vehicles to be approaching so fast.

“Such conduct could cause the government to review the existing permission for time trials to take place on public roads, expose riders and organisers and CTT officials to the possibility of civil and criminal proceedings, and invalidate the insurance CTT holds for participants in time trials.”

> Cyclists fear safe time trial courses will be lost as governing body introduces ban on events in 20mph zones

CTT also noted that its rules “have always required riders to ride safely and obey all traffic signs together with the Highway Code and that failure to do so is a disciplinary offence” – an offence, it says, which will now encompass riders racing at over 20mph in the new reduced zones.

“There will therefore be an overriding principle that all riders in time trials must adhere to posted speed limits as well as all other rules of the road,” it says.

“In any event, in order to achieve fair competition, where a course with a section which is subject to a 20mph limit is used, riders must not exceed that speed. Otherwise, the event will no longer be a ‘race of truth’ because a rider who exceeds the limit will gain an unfair advantage over one who does not.”

time trial club tt 2.JPG

> “If you have a bike, you can ride a time trial!” Road bike participation in time trials up 42 per cent, after TT governing body introduced new category last year

While clamping down on the individual speeds of its time trialists – a measure that has raised concerns over how it will be implemented – the governing body also asserted that “any course which incorporates a section with a 20mph limit should not be used if a suitable alternative is available”.

It continued: “This will require the District and organiser to consider whether changes can be made to a course to avoid the 20mph section. If not, the District should consider whether any other suitable course is available, taking into account the nature of the event and the area from which riders are expected to come.

“The history of the event and any scenic qualities will not play a role in this decision unless they are relevant to the safety of riders and other road users. A particular aspect of 20mph zones is that they will usually (and more often will in future) be accompanied by traffic calming measures.  These can present serious hazards for cyclist and other road users and in themselves may mean that a course is not safe.”

However, CTT noted that if a district is satisfied that no suitable alternative is available, it may allow an event to go ahead on a course with a 20mph section if the following exceptions apply:

It is a Hill Climb, so long as both the organiser and the District are satisfied there is no reasonable expectation riders will exceed 20mph, whether up or down the hill.

The 20mph limit is on a section of road for which a Traffic Management Order (restricting access by motor vehicles) will be in force at the time of the event.

There are very short (up to 100 metre) sections of 20 mph limits where the geography makes it unlikely riders will exceed that speed in any event. Such sections will usually be at the start of an event or include a feature such as a corner or roundabout where riders will naturally slow anyway. At such a feature, two sections of up to 100 metres (one before and one after) may be permitted.

Meanwhile, longer 20mph stretches (in this case, over 100m) could possibly still be used as long as “active measures” are in place to ensure riders don’t stray above the speed limit.

These active measures include warnings on risk assessments, start sheets, and on “prominently displayed” notices at the start for club events, along with the use of additional marshals at speed restrictions signs and traffic calming measures “with, if possible, signs displaying the number 20”.

Longer 20mph sections will also be permitted if the district committee is convinced that “no reasonable alternative exists and the cancellation of the event would lead to a serious loss to time trialling in that area”, and that its distance will not lead to potential non-compliance by those taking part.

> Why the 20mph zone time trial ban could be the “tip of the iceberg” for British racing 

Cycling Time Trials’ latest guidance will arguably do little to quell the concerns of members and club riders, who believe the restrictions surrounding 20mph speed limits could lead to the loss of a substantial portion of Britain’s TT courses and, with the domestic scene struggling in general in recent years, facilitate the demise of one of the country’s most venerable cycling pastimes.

“The majority of courses cannot be used,” Jonty Gordon, the chairman of Clwb Beicio Egni Eryri and a director at 1816 Cycles told us in November.

“I know of some clubs whose regular 10-mile courses will all be unusable. Given the difficulty in finding routes that don’t feature 20mph areas, there is a real risk that TTs will simply disappear in Wales.

“I do really think it is going to affect TTs as there are now so many 20mph routes, finding a safe and approachable one, not a 50mph road or dual carriageway, is going to be nigh-on impossible.”

Speaking to the road.cc Podcast, Jonty also explained that the new rules could have serious legal implications, potentially turn away young people and women from the sport over safety concerns, and that they may prove just the “tip of the iceberg” – especially when it comes to political and societal attitudes – when it comes to the future of bike racing, and the political and societal attitudes towards it, on open British roads.

Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

91 comments

Avatar
TheAdebo replied to Velophaart_95 | 3 months ago
7 likes

One of the historic attractions of TTs is their accessibility. Part of which was always the low cost to race. Hiring venues will up entry fees making TTs less accessible.

Avatar
brianlescargot replied to Velophaart_95 | 3 months ago
0 likes

Open roads aren't 20mph. That's built up areas not suitable for TT

Avatar
D.Railleur | 3 months ago
2 likes

It's such a bad idea to even consider racing in a 20mph zone. Crazy in fact. Whilst those riders in TT event will have to stick to the 20mph limit( even though they'll all try to eek out an extra mile an hour or two), any other cyclist won't have to stick to the 20 mph limit. This will attract an element of cyclists who just want to showboat. The watching public will just see cyclists. Before you know it the Parish Council, the village hall committee and chief choreographer of the old time formation dance ensemble will be on the blower to the old bill and your TT event will be in the local papers for all the wrong reasons, and then after a short while, will be consigned to history.

Avatar
Capt Sisko | 3 months ago
3 likes

When I did my IAM motorcycle course and you chose to do something legal, but looks wrong to others, such as filtering, straightlining a corner or riding on the wrong side of the road to get an improved view of the road ahead, they tell you to think 'SLAP' before you do it. It stands for is it Safe, Legal, Advantageous, and Perception; and it's that last bit that's important in the CTT 20mph zones discussion that's important here.

IF, (and that's big if), but if others are adhering to their rules, yet you have a different set of rules that includes things they can't do, this seems to them that you're allowed to do something that they're not, hence they get p*ssed off. Riding faster than 20mph on 20mph zone falls into that category and I can understand their point of view.

Avatar
wtjs replied to Capt Sisko | 3 months ago
5 likes

this seems to them that you're allowed to do something that they're not, hence they get p*ssed off

I find myself unconcerned by this.

Avatar
Morgoth985 replied to wtjs | 3 months ago
1 like

I find myself concerned, because these nutters will then take the law into their own hands. That said, I emphatically do not suggest that the solution is for cyclists to comply, rather it is for the authorities to ensure compliance by those to whom the law applies and not otherwise.  I know, dream on.

Avatar
wtjs replied to Morgoth985 | 3 months ago
3 likes

rather it is for the authorities to ensure compliance by those to whom the law applies

Since they, in Lancashire at least, don't make any effort to impress the law upon motorists when that law is pretty simple 'because everybody breaks it', it seems unlikely they will bother in other cases

https://upride.cc/incident/k7ddy_audia4_redlightpass/

WU59 UMH, for those lucky enough to have avoided my previous efforts, has had no MOT/ VED for 6 1/2 years and had a failed MOT over 3 months ago, and was reported to the not at all idle, useless, ineffectual and bent police over 6 months ago, is here shown in the usual position outside the pub 100 yards from Garstang Police Station

Avatar
IanGlasgow | 3 months ago
2 likes

Many urban areas in Europe have 30kph (18mph) or even 20kph (12mph) speed limits.
How do THEY cope with time trials? Has anybody from British Cycling bothered to check?

Avatar
Backladder replied to IanGlasgow | 3 months ago
2 likes

Time trials are a british thing arising out of the history of the legality of the sport, I don't believe they happen elsewhere to anything like the same extent.

Avatar
Morgoth985 replied to Backladder | 3 months ago
1 like

Really?  Not necessarily challenging as I have no knowledge on this, but lots of countries produce world class time triallists.  How did they learn?

Avatar
Backladder replied to Morgoth985 | 3 months ago
0 likes

Time trials in grand tours. world championships and olympics etc are usually fairly random distances and terrain and are quite rare, you can train for this by riding road races and a bit of work on your aero position, the CTT time trials are much more common with dozens of events every weekend during the summer which are overwhelmingly one of the standard 10/25/50/100 mile distances, often on main roads and people train specifically for these event distances. For a brief insight into the history see  https://cyclinguphill.com/cycling-time-trials/

Avatar
ktache | 3 months ago
2 likes

WFH on Monday, train drivers on strike, GWR, (they deserve a pay rise), and went for a bit of a ride, did my hour loop into the bottom of the Chilterns. Been a bit dry recent so decided to go the extra horsey bit, mud had set VERY lumpy, had to get off for little bits. But what I did notice was a lot of very new and sparkly, no dirt or muck let alone algae, 20 mph roundels, on every bit where there was a few houses.
Not enforceable, of course, but much more difficult to come up with an explanation of why your vehicle ended up in someone's house...

Avatar
Miller replied to ktache | 3 months ago
2 likes

Oxfordshire has gone for village 20mph zones in a big way.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 3 months ago
5 likes

This 20MPH stuff is a red herring.  The CTT is just running scared.

Look at the speeds of all these records (some out of date)

Are we really meant to believe none of them occured in a 30 limit?

https://cyclinguphill.com/time-trial-records/

Avatar
quiff | 3 months ago
8 likes

"CTT urged its members to “ignore any such suggestion” from “some websites [that] state speed limits do not apply to cyclists”."

What, like this one? https://www.gov.wales/introducing-20mph-speed-limits-frequently-asked-questions#91814

Avatar
wtjs | 3 months ago
8 likes

This all reminds me of the self inflicted wound when British Cycling advised people to avoid cycling during the Queen's funeral, encouraging more driving instead.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to wtjs | 3 months ago
2 likes

If only they'd encouraged everyone to horse instead of riding our poor man's nags.  Surely Ma'am would have approved and I believe many of the relatives are keen horsists...

Even fast riders would no doubt appreciate the power increase (up to 1 hp!) while if only drivers had adopted carriages in turn we'd have had a much quieter more pleasant day.  Barring the odd one or two dedicated to fast driving of course.

Avatar
HLaB | 3 months ago
3 likes

Will cyclists get the same leaway as motorists 110% + 2 mph? In which case I can go flat out on the club TT and win it sad

Avatar
Clem Fandango replied to HLaB | 3 months ago
3 likes

It's only a requirement if someone (the lesser spotted traffic cop or a speed camera) is looking though right?

Avatar
Tom_77 | 3 months ago
19 likes

“Generally, 20 mph limits and time trials are incompatible. Most riders travel between 20 and 30mph. Riding at that speed is capable of causing public outrage..."

I wish cars exceeding 20 mph limits were capable of causing public outrage.

Avatar
Steve K replied to Tom_77 | 3 months ago
25 likes

Tom_77 wrote:

“Generally, 20 mph limits and time trials are incompatible. Most riders travel between 20 and 30mph. Riding at that speed is capable of causing public outrage..."

I wish cars exceeding 20 mph limits were capable of causing public outrage.

There is no speed it is possible to ride a bike that is not capable of causing public outrage,

Avatar
brooksby | 3 months ago
0 likes

Playing devil's advocate for a minute, I suppose what CTT are doing as regards speed limits is only the same as UCI insisting on a helmet even when they are not legally mandated?

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to brooksby | 3 months ago
2 likes

brooksby wrote:

Playing devil's advocate for a minute, I suppose what CTT are doing as regards speed limits is only the same as UCI insisting on a helmet even when they are not legally mandated?

Not really comparable. Racing is dangerous, crashes happen as a result of racing, head injuries can occur... whether bike helmets do much to mitigate that is another matter.

Time trialling isn't dangerous in itself and speed limits do not apply to cyclists, although maybe they should for velomobiles.

I really wonder how the 20mph is going to be enforced or policed in a time trial.
How many time triallers have injured or hurt people?

Avatar
brooksby replied to ChrisB200SX | 3 months ago
1 like

ChrisB200SX wrote:

brooksby wrote:

Playing devil's advocate for a minute, I suppose what CTT are doing as regards speed limits is only the same as UCI insisting on a helmet even when they are not legally mandated?

Not really comparable. Racing is dangerous, crashes happen as a result of racing, head injuries can occur... whether bike helmets do much to mitigate that is another matter.

Time trialling isn't dangerous in itself and speed limits do not apply to cyclists, although maybe they should for velomobiles.

I really wonder how the 20mph is going to be enforced or policed in a time trial.
How many time triallers have injured or hurt people?

Why isn't it comparable?  I had meant that CTT are insisting on observance of a 'speed limit' law which doesn't ordinarily apply to cyclists, and I had thought that was a bit like UCI adding a rule insisting on helmets even where helmets are not legally mandated.  YMMV.

 

 

PS - Didn't we have a troll on here back in the day who was very concerned about the perceived dangers of time trialling?

Avatar
IanMK replied to brooksby | 3 months ago
2 likes

I don't think it's the same. Requiring PPE in a given situation is based on a risk assessment. The assessment would be that the risk should be as low as reasonably practical (ALARP). In this case, in the context of the activity going slower is not really practical.

 

Avatar
brooksby replied to IanMK | 3 months ago
2 likes

IanMK wrote:

I don't think it's the same. Requiring PPE in a given situation is based on a risk assessment. The assessment would be that the risk should be as low as reasonably practical (ALARP). In this case, in the context of the activity going slower is not really practical.

OK, I think I get it now. Apologies to ChrisB200SX for my being a bit dim  3

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to brooksby | 3 months ago
1 like

brooksby wrote:

OK, I think I get it now. Apologies to ChrisB200SX for my being a bit dim  3

There is a definitely a parallel where they are bizarrely insisting that people do something that they are not legally required to do and the "solution" that is being mandated may not really make any difference.

Avatar
cbrndc replied to brooksby | 3 months ago
3 likes

CTT also mandate the wearing of helmets when competing. Front and rear lights are also mandated by CTT even though it is not law to use them from sunrise to sunset. No helmet or lights - you cannot compete.

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to cbrndc | 3 months ago
0 likes

cbrndc wrote:

CTT also mandate the wearing of helmets when competing. Front and rear lights are also mandated by CTT even though it is not law to use them from sunrise to sunset. No helmet or lights - you cannot compete.

Similarly nonsensicle.

Avatar
Morgoth985 replied to ChrisB200SX | 3 months ago
1 like

No, this is getting sidetracked I think.  Time trialling with a helmet and light can sensibly improve safety (helmet debaters notwithstanding but bear with me) without destroying the whole idea on the basis of prejudice.  Speed limits for time trials are wholly down to prejudice- even CTT say so.

Pages

Latest Comments