Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

“Looks like the cyclist deliberately made contact with the car”: Driver pulls across three lanes and hits cyclist – and motorists claim cyclist was at fault

“I honestly can’t see how you can put even one per cent of the blame for that on the cyclist,” the social media user who captured the collision said

A rush hour collision between a cyclist and a motorist, who pulled across three lanes before hitting the rider, has sparked a heated debate on social media, where motorists have claimed that the female cyclist was at fault for failing to avoid the collision – with some drivers even claiming that the rider deliberately steered into the vehicle.

The clip, which was captured by the dash cam of cyclist Gary’s Transit van, was posted on the social media platform formerly known as Twitter on Thursday night and has since been viewed over 170,000 times.

It shows a hi-vis-clad female cyclist riding in a bus lane East Bridge Street, just outside Lanyon Place railway station, in the direction of Belfast city centre at around 7.45am in the morning, when a motorist, travelling in the opposite direction, pulled across three lanes and hit the rider, who emerged relatively unscathed from the collision.

Describing the collision, Gary said: “I did not let the car across, I was leaving the gap for the car on the left emerging. But the driver indicated and pulled across so quickly, assuming it was clear to go, he didn’t check.

“He didn’t see the cyclist because he plain didn’t look for it. His reactions were good when he did to be fair. He had stopped (just about) but the cyclist was on the brakes and slowing down.

He continued: “The cyclist could have anticipated a little better, but her head is clearly up and she is on the brakes. Can’t brake and swerve at the same time on two wheels or you’ll hit the deck.

“We all have a duty of care on the roads but no you can’t rely on anyone these days. Some take that duty of care more seriously than others.”

> Motorists blame crash victim Dan Walker for not riding on underpass cycle lane – described by locals as “filled with broken glass”

Despite Gary’s rather balanced appraisal of the collision, the clip – rather inevitably – led to a deluge of motorists claiming that the cyclist was solely at fault for the crash.

“If the cyclist was paying attention, he/she could have avoided that,” wrote Kesh. “Also, the car clearly hasn’t seen the cyclist coming due to visibility being blocked by cam car.”

“Car stopped the second it saw the cyclist, the vehicle recording blocked the view of the other driver seeing the cyclist, cyclist didn’t apply his brakes in time because he was travelling too fast at a busy junction,” added another user.

“Bike’s fault. I’m not even trying to cause an argument,” said Earl. “When filtering you have to take responsibility at junctions. The bike just went for it. Car has a right to turn and it would have been impossible to see the bike in them conditions.”

> “I love it when drivers harass me for breaking rules they made up in their head”: Motorist tells cyclist he’ll “get a ticket for being in the bus lane”… while driving an untaxed car

Some motorists, meanwhile, even attempted to claim that the cyclist had intentionally made contact with the motorist’s vehicle to cause the collision.

“It might just be the camera angle, but if you slow the video down just as the cyclist comes into frame, it looks like he changed angle to make sure he made contact with the car,” wrote Kevin. “Also he could have narrowly avoided the car by pulley slightly to the left.”

“He’s done the equivalent of sticking your leg out to make contact with the defender to win a penalty,” agreed LF. “Shocking dive, yellow card worthy.”

That particular argument was swiftly condemned by Gary and other Twitter-using cyclists.

“Didn’t change direction and she was attempting to brake in a straight line. If she had changed direction with the wet road on the brakes the most likely outcome was her falling off anyway. She did NOT intentionally hit the car,” said Gary.

“Another person who feels the need to bend over backwards to find a reason – ANY reason – why the car driver shouldn’t be blamed. Do you seriously think we cyclists deliberately try to get hit by cars? WHY???” asked Ymke.

Finally, Andreas summed the whole debate up: “I see the comments are mostly that the cyclist was at fault for (checks notes) cycling.”

Ironically, the hotly debated collision took place mere yards away from another incident that caused a mini-social media furore two weeks ago. That incident, which happened on the same road but in the opposite direction, saw a driver pull diagonally into a bike box, almost colliding with cyclists and an adjacent car.

After the cyclists had pointed out the motorist’s mistake, he then emerged from his vehicle to berate the riders, holding up traffic as the lights turned green.

Coventry crash May 2023 (via West Midlands Police)

> "You must stop driving and surrender your licence to the authorities": Jeremy Vine in disbelief at people blaming cyclist for shocking crash which saw driver jailed

And in December, footage released by West Midlands Police, showing the moment a 71-year-old cyclist was left with a bleed on the brain, a broken shoulder, and a broken ankle after a driver ignored give way markings and caused the collision, provoked a wave of social media users queuing up to defend the motorist’s driving.

Despite the motorist being jailed for 12 months after pleading guilty to causing serious injury by careless driving, some claimed that the cyclist was “irresponsible” and “shouldn’t have been going that fast”, and that they were “probably breaking the speed limit but clearly not proceeding towards a major crossing with caution”.

Responding to those questionable replies, BBC and Channel 5 presenter Jeremy Vine, who cycles around London and posts videos of his travels on social media, wrote: “Watch the red car. Watch the cyclist. Now ask yourself, ‘Was the woman on the bicycle to blame in any way for that collision? Should she have avoided it?’

“If your answer is any version of yes, YOU MUST stop driving and surrender your driving licence to the authorities.”

Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

39 comments

Avatar
LeadenSkies replied to Hirsute | 3 months ago
3 likes

I like to think with decent road craft and 40 odd years experience I would have eased off and been on the brakes just in case the Muppet* driver decided to pull across without looking. In reality though I have off moments with my road craft and I probably would have ended up with the same result here. There is a massive difference though between having a slight off day on the advanced road craft and failing to make even the most basic checks that the way is clear before pulling across a live lane. One is excusable if regrettable, the other should lead to prosecution for careless driving.

* Other adjectives are available and are far better at describing the total lack of care shown by this driver but I don't like online swearing!

Avatar
Hirsute replied to LeadenSkies | 3 months ago
5 likes

I hope the driver is prosecuted and gets a decent fine and insurance hike.

I've certainly increased my awareness of emerging hazards from previous videos like this and various dashcam ones.

Although you can't avoid them all - pure luck in me not being wiped out by this moron.

Avatar
wtjs replied to Hirsute | 3 months ago
0 likes

I hope the driver is prosecuted and gets a decent fine and insurance hike

You can hope, but he won't be, under the 'can't be bothered/ insufficient resources' rule

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to LeadenSkies | 3 months ago
5 likes
LeadenSkies wrote:

... There is a massive difference though between having a slight off day on the advanced road craft and failing to make even the most basic checks that the way is clear before pulling across a live lane. One is excusable if regrettable, the other should lead to prosecution for careless driving.

IMO the vast majority of collisions have resulted from two things

1) a road user making a mistake, driving contray to the highway code

2) another road user failing to bail them out for that mistake

The fault of the collision is road user 1, but aside from being hit from the rear while stationary, road user 2 normally has an opportunity to save them.

Cyclists are generally very good at 2, so it sticks out when it doesn't happen. But all this talk of advanced roadcraft and anticipation is basically saying cyclists normally cover for driver error, why didn't this cyclist cover for this drivers error?

Almost all near misses shown have responses about how the cyclist COULD have avoided the collision, despite the evidence that they did actually avoid the collision, so it basically comes down to "could have avoided it better"

Guarante that if a pedestrian or cyclist had stepped/rolled out in front of a driver in a clear lane and then stopped, other drivers would not be laying the balme at the driver for not slowing down to anticipate problems. In fact if a driver had been travelling at the speed of the cyclist in the clip, they would have been applauded for being slow and careful, at exactly the same speed described as "going for it" when a cyclist does it.

Avatar
LeadenSkies replied to wycombewheeler | 3 months ago
0 likes

I don't disagree one bit. I certainly don't blame the cyclist in anyway, I even said that I thought I would have had the same outcome despite 40+ years of road cycling ) driving experience.

Roadçraft / anticipation / situational awareness - call it what you will - is something that I try to deploy when driving just as much as when walking/ cycling and yes it often allows me to correct or minimise other people's mistakes but I only ever deploy it for entirely selfish reasons in that I don't want to be involved in a collision, even one that isn't my fault.

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 4 months ago
9 likes

As drivers are happy to demand that cyclists do everything, and more, to avoid collisions, what did this driver do to avoid hitting the cyclist? The question includes the basic premise of ensuring the road ahead is clear... (for the smart arses, given the cyclist was there, the driver could not have been 100% sure and therefore shouldn't have moved).

Avatar
David9694 replied to don simon fbpe | 3 months ago
1 like

How was I supposed to make that turn - you tell me 

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to David9694 | 3 months ago
1 like

You wait until it is safe to do so. Why is that such a hard concept? You tell me!

Avatar
Hirsute replied to don simon fbpe | 3 months ago
1 like

Sarcasm

Pages

Latest Comments