Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

OPINION

How does road.cc make money? Wonder no more

Avatar
People often ask how Britain's biggest road cycling website pays for the palatial office, the jet-setting bike journo lifestyle, the coffee and cake... let's lift the lid on how road.cc pays its way

Welcome to the fourth (or possibly fifth) edition of the blog where I tell you how we pay for road.cc. Before I let you in on that secret though, I’d like to tell you what sets road.cc apart from the rest of the cycling media, and that isn’t how we make money. 

Unlike BikeRadar, Cycling Weekly, CyclingTips, Cyclingnews or indeed any other major cycling website I can think of (bar Singletrack) road.cc is independent. We’re not owned by a massive media conglomerate, venture capitalists or a private equity fund. We’re owned by F-At Digital, which is basically the road.cc team with different hats on. We’re not answerable to the man, or the SEO team, or the target. 

Now, I know that the editorial teams on rival sites value their editorial integrity too, and there are some very good people working on those sites. Ultimately though, they are working under a different commercial ethos – their bosses, or their bosses bosses, have a board, shareholders and investors to answer to, and at that rarefied level it’s only the bottom line that counts. We obviously pay close attention to that too, in fact doing so is my job – but it’s only one measure of success, the one that means we can keep going, but it’s not why we keep going.

I digress! We came here to talk money…. so if you’re sitting comfortably, then lean in a little closer, scroll down and I’ll tell you the secret of how our dough is made…

IT’S (STILL) THE ADS!

Well, what did you expect? As it was in the beginning, it still is now. The adverts are far and away the biggest source of revenue for road.cc and its sister sites off.road.cc and ebiketips also. They pay our wages and keep the lights – and more importantly, our computers and server – on. We have other ways of making money too which I’ll tell you about in a moment, but mostly it’s the ads, of which there are two types: bike industry ads (we call them direct ads), and programmatic ads (the rest).

But… what if ads on websites bring you out in a rash, but at the same time you don’t want to dash the hard-earned crust from the lips of team road.cc? Or you just like what we do and you’d like to make a contribution to helping us do it better?

We’ve got you covered…

Supporter subscriptions

For £19.99 a year or £1.99 a month, you can support road.cc (and our other websites) and get automatic ad-free access to all of them. If you subscribe already, and I’m guessing this is the sort of thing many subscribers will read, then a huge THANKS!

If you don’t subscribe, then why not consider it? As well as helping to support us in bringing you the latest cycling-related news that you probably won’t read on other cycling websites, plus our independent and unbiased tech news and reviews, you’ll also get a warm glow and BFF status with everyone at road.cc. If you spend a lot of time on road.cc then subscribing will probably save you some data over the year too. It might even pay for itself, maybe.

One of our projects for this year is to see what more we can do for subscribers. Pre-Covid, we had regular rideouts and we’d definitely like to get back to doing those. We’re also investigating what we can put together in the way of subscriber-only offers and deals. So, if you are a subscriber and you’ve got any suggestions we’d love to hear them, and the same goes if you aren’t. 

Right, back to the ads...

Direct ads are so-called because we sell them directly to the advertiser, whereas with programmatic we’re not involved in the sales process – it’s all done by computers, hence the ‘programmatic’. 

Direct ads

We’ll talk direct first, because it’s the one that I’m guessing you’re most interested in – particularly with regards to our relationship with the bike industry advertisers, and how it might influence us editorially… it doesn’t, by the way. You knew I’d say that, but I’ll say it anyway because it’s true!

Our direct ad revenue comes overwhelmingly from various parts of the bike industry, either brands, retailers or UK distributors. And, no, that doesn’t mean we’re in their pockets. Some of you won’t believe me when I say this, but that doesn’t stop it being true.

What matters to our advertisers – more than the number of you who come to the site every day – is road.cc’s reputation with you. That’s what they are buying into. That’s just one of the reasons why our standing with road.cc users is so important to us,  and why we’re not going to do anything to jeopardise our reputation – even if it causes complications with advertisers, which it occasionally does. 

Most advertisers wouldn’t expect otherwise, especially when it comes to reviews. They’ll take a bad review on the chin if people trust the good ones, which is also why we place such a premium on the quality and rigour of our reviewing process. 

So does advertising buy you anything when it comes to reviews? No. We would always try and review a product from an advertiser (if they wanted to send one in for review). Given the open-ended nature of publishing a news and reviews website there is no competition for review slots, so there’s never a question of ‘should we review product A from an advertiser or product B from a non-advertiser?’ We’d review both.

I should also say that we’d never turn down a product for review just because the brand/supplier doesn’t advertise with us. The vast majority of products reviewed on road.cc are from non-advertisers. But I digress (again)…

Programmatic ads

Back in the day (around 2014 I think) when I wrote the first version of this piece, I talked about us selling off our spare ad slots on the ad exchanges. Things have moved on a bit since then: the site has grown (a lot), online advertising has changed (a lot), how the bike industry like to spend their marketing budgets has changed (more on that later), and since 2016 the world is a less certain place for UK businesses. 

In the autumn of 2016, with an uncanny herd instinct, the bike industry paused its marketing spend as they all tried to figure out what Brexit meant (higher costs, more paperwork), and what to do (ignore it until it’s unignorable). That few weeks is the closest road.cc has come to a near-death experience, and the shock forced us to accelerate the process of diversifying our income streams. 

Luckily the growth in site traffic and the ever-evolving world of online advertising offered a solution – programmatic advertising. Every time you load a road.cc page onto your digital device, real-time auctions are taking place for every ad slot – the winner gets access to your eyeballs. So far, the British cyclist’s eyeballs have been a fairly stable unit of currency in uncertain times (we also sell to a fair few non-British eyeballs too). No surprise then that programmatic ads are the other big pillar of road.cc’s finances.

Programmatic ads get a bad rep, and certainly some sites overdo them, cramming them in all flashing and a-blinking, getting in the way and generally detracting from the user experience. We’ve tried to take a more balanced ‘less is more approach’ – quality over quantity, and by quality I mean the environment in which you see the ad, rather than necessarily the ad itself. It’s worth remembering that for the time being at least, the majority of programmatic ads you see are generated by Google’s algorithm and are based on your own previous browsing habits. 

We have no direct relationship with programmatic advertisers. They simply want the chance to advertise their wares to people like you, and ideally on a site you like and trust. So again, it’s in everybody’s interests that the programmatic ads that get served don’t annoy you. It’s a tricky balance to get right, but believe me we are always trying to get it right.

So that’s the advertising. What other ways do we have of making money?

Affiliate links

If you click on an affiliate link and buy something, we get a small percentage paid back to us (a very small percentage). Of course, when you’ve got thousands of reviews and hundreds of buyer’s guides on your site, those small amounts all add up. It’s a numbers game.

These days most sites affiliatise buying links, and certainly all our competitors do. For some, affiliate revenue is a much more prominent part of their business model than it is for us. We don’t make massive amounts of money from affiliate, but it’s a nice extra from something we’d do anyway.

Nearly all the links on road.cc to somewhere you can buy something are affiliate ones. The majority are automated, because the process for affiliatising them is part of the site code –  that includes any buying links you might add in a comment, or on the forum. The few buying links that aren’t affiliatised are like that because whoever is selling that product isn’t part of an affiliate network. As I said earlier, we’d put those links in anyway because it’s helpful to the person reading the review or buyer’s guide – if we get something back it’s a bonus. 

Our approach to the ones we put in ourselves is to find and link to the best-delivered price in the UK. It can be a slow process because the best advertised price is not always the best UK-delivered price. This became such a labour intensive process that a few years back we signed up to an automated system. Sovrn101 powers the price comparison widget in reviews, and some buyer’s guides, and it’s also plugged into the deals on our DealClincher site. The other buying links are still done the old fashioned way though.

The big advantage for us of the widget, apart from the money, is that it frees up time for our reviews production team. The big advantage for anyone reading the review is that that widget is constantly updating, so there should always be a choice of relevant deals for that product.

Any downsides? Well, the Sovrn widget can only pull data that is uploaded to the affiliate networks, so if a retailer is not part of a supported affiliate network it won’t pull in their price. That said, we reckon we’ve got the vast majority of online retailers covered.

Sponsored content

"Hey! Let’s do something cool with our ad budget that isn’t an ad, …but y’know deep down really is."

I’m not a fan of sponsored content (you probably guessed that) because for me it blurs the line between the part of the page that’s trying to sell you stuff and the part that’s trying to tell you stuff. But I have to admit that I’m in a minority on this one and that crucially, you the people who read and comment on road.cc tell us that so long as it’s relevant and informative, you don’t mind sponcon (as we call it on our side of the fence – it’s called native content on the marketing side of the fence). 

Bike industry marketing people also know this stuff only works if it’s relevant and interesting to you, and if it looks, feels and reads like any other road.cc article – that the best sponcon is something that you’d want to read anyway. And crucially we have editorial control, so if we don’t like it we won’t run it. 

These days the majority of sponsored content on road.cc is video, and what we call ‘social edits’ – video snippets that are posted on social media. So, it’s really made for those channels rather than the road.cc site itself. I also have to admit that even back in the old days, we never had a problem with a brand sponsoring parts of the site like #Mycyclingweekend or our Tour de France coverage. 

So, my attitude to sponcon has softened. People paying you money will do that, although I’m also keenly aware that usually this isn’t new money. It’s the bike industry reallocating money they’d otherwise have spent on advertising… er, cool stuff.

Interesting times…

Given I’ve been talking about how we make money, I should probably mention the challenging times we’re currently trying to make it in. As you’ll all know only too well it’s tough out there for people and businesses trying to earn a living. Very tough. That said, we’d like to think that road.cc is built on pretty solid foundations. Running a business at any time is a constant process of learning on the job so we’re not taking anything for granted, but with the support of our team, you our audience, and our advertisers – particularly the bike industry – we’re confident in the future of road.cc for the short, medium and long term. Hey! Don’t tell anyone, but we’ve even diversified so much we’re about to launch a car site… 

Anything else?

Well you can buy road.cc cycling gear and merchandise, or some Cyclists! Stay Awesome stickers… we’re always happy to sell you those! (Preferably in bulk).

road.cc's founder and first editor, nowadays to be found riding a spreadsheet. Tony's journey in cycling media started in 1997 as production editor and then deputy editor of Total Bike, acting editor of Total Mountain Bike and then seven years as editor of Cycling Plus. He launched his first cycling website - the Cycling Plus Forum at the turn of the century. In 2006 he left C+ to head up the launch team for Bike Radar which he edited until 2008, when he co-launched the multi-award winning road.cc - finally handing on the reins in 2021 to Jack Sexty. His favourite ride is his ‘commute’ - which he does most days inc weekends and he’s been cycle-commuting since 1994. His favourite bikes are titanium and have disc brakes, though he'd like to own a carbon bike one day.

Add new comment

62 comments

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to Sredlums | 12 months ago
1 like

Shush! Maybe it's a cunning plan; exploiting the drivists to pay for the cycling advocacy?

Avatar
Tony Farrelly replied to Sredlums | 12 months ago
0 likes

they're not both his bios. One is, the other is the About page of the not yet launched site

Avatar
quiff replied to Tony Farrelly | 12 months ago
0 likes

These are both bios though:

"His interest in EVs goes back a long way, but mostly stemming from his love for all things transport-related"

"Cycling became a part of his life just a couple of years ago out of his distaste for cars, and now he can't think of a single reason why anyone would drive if they could cycle." 

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to Sredlums | 12 months ago
3 likes

Sredlums wrote:

if it's true that the same person writes for both sites with such contradicting bio's (of which at least one is untrue), then that is simply inexcusable.

“The key to success is sincerity. If you can fake that you've got it made” (George Burns)

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Rendel Harris | 12 months ago
4 likes

Bit disappointing, true.  Well I would like to believe we're all a sacred band... but realistically "journalists":

You cannot hope to bribe or twist,
thank God! the British journalist.
But, seeing what the man will do
unbribed, there's no occasion to.
 - Humbert Wolfe (apparently)

Also - I can't be too critical as I have driven cars myself.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to chrisonabike | 12 months ago
2 likes

chrisonatrike wrote:

Also - I can't be too critical as I have driven cars myself.

We're all human and fallible, eh? However I don't think that precludes criticising organisations that seem to be preaching one thing and practising another; despite the fact that I have in the past occasionally flown on an aeroplane I wouldn't say that would exclude me from criticising if the Green Party decided to start its own airline.

Avatar
Sredlums replied to Rendel Harris | 12 months ago
5 likes

Very well put.
I don't hate cars, I hate how as a society we completely surrendered to them (and the big industries behind them), ruining a lot of very good and essential things in the proces, and getting way to dependant on them.

So yes, I drive sometimes too. I share a car with a friend, we each have it on a week on, week off basis, and many of the weeks that the car is 'mine' I don't even use it. But sometimes it is the most practical/cost effective thing to do, and sometimes there is not even a viable alternative.
So yes, car drivers can be critical of car culture.

Avatar
Tony Farrelly replied to Rendel Harris | 12 months ago
1 like

Rendel Harris wrote:

chrisonatrike wrote:

Also - I can't be too critical as I have driven cars myself.

We're all human and fallible, eh? However I don't think that precludes criticising organisations that seem to be preaching one thing and practising another; despite the fact that I have in the past occasionally flown on an aeroplane I wouldn't say that would exclude me from criticising if the Green Party decided to start its own airline.

We've never preached anything. In fact "preaching" is very much frowned upon in these parts. If you can give some examples of any preaching we've done…?
Holding up a mirror to what's happening on Britain's roads that reinforces your own particular world view is not preaching by us - any sermon is an internal monologue of your own.

road.cc reports news about things that affect cyclists - as impartially as we can. We very, very rarely editorialise or comment on any news story. 

Which it's also worth pointing out makes up about a quarter of its output the rest being tech news and buying advice of one type or another.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Tony Farrelly | 12 months ago
3 likes

Tony Farrelly wrote:

We've never preached anything. In fact "preaching" is very much frowned upon in these parts. If you can give some examples of any preaching we've done…?
Holding up a mirror to what's happening on Britain's roads that reinforces your own particular world view is not preaching by us - any sermon is an internal monologue of your own.

Preaching can simply mean earnestly to advocate or to affirm one's support for a particular cause, which road.cc has undeniably done in terms of its support for active travel and in particular better provision and protection for cyclists. In this instance, as I'm sure you are aware, I have simply used an adaptation of the familiar phrase "practise what you preach" and it would be more fitting for you to address the actual point rather than start to argue over the semantic definition of a particular verb in a common saying. Said point being why, specifically, one of your staff writers claims on this website to have a "distaste for cars" whilst writing on your new website that is apparently staffed by "a passionate bunch of enthusiasts who eat, sleep and breathe car culture." More generally, I'm sure many readers and subscribers like myself would like to know more about the rationale behind a website that has unquestionably challenged the hegemony of car culture in our society creating a new website that, in its own words, appears to celebrate it. If you could actually address those issues without the rather strange gaslighting comments about internal monologues that would be appreciated.

PS If you believe that "preaching is very much frowned upon in these parts" I suggest you look at the "Opinion" section of this website which contains dozens of articles that could be said to fall under that heading, from your own journalists and from guests.

Avatar
Tony Farrelly replied to Rendel Harris | 12 months ago
0 likes

We haven't actually launched EV.Tips yet so that about blurb, which is a bit over the top, will probably change. It's a buying advice site for people wanting to buy an electric vehicle - because there's more news around EVs it has a news section too.

As a company we obviously support cycling and active travel, we're nearly all cyclists for starters. Do we support it over car use? Well, bad car use; and the stranglehold cars have when it comes to allocating resources and commanding the attention of politicians, but are we against car use itself? No, and I don't think we've ever said otherwise.

Avatar
Sredlums replied to Tony Farrelly | 12 months ago
1 like

What you describe, "Well, bad car use; and the stranglehold cars have when it comes to allocating resources and commanding the attention of politicians", THAT's car culture.
For me the most problematic aspect of this all, is that you claim to support that very culture. If you had said something in the lines of 'As a platform we aim to inform people about the best suited mode of transport for their circumstances. When that happens to be a car, this site is the place to find the information on how to choose the best value, sustainable electric car that helps keep traffic and surroundings safe and pleasant', I would have just thought 'meh' and moved on.
It's the embracing of car culture that makes this move so hypocritical.

Avatar
Tony Farrelly replied to Sredlums | 12 months ago
0 likes

Is loving bikes and cars mutually exclusive then?
I'll answer my own question and say that for most people I'm not sure it is. Historically, think it's changed a bit in recent years, car ownership amongst cyclists was higher than for the general population.

Avatar
Sredlums replied to Tony Farrelly | 12 months ago
0 likes

No, but like i explained in another comment, loving bikes and car culture is mutually exclusive. Or at least it should be to anyone who is fair about the direct effect of car culture on cyclists.

Avatar
NOtotheEU replied to Tony Farrelly | 12 months ago
4 likes

Tony Farrelly wrote:

Is loving bikes and cars mutually exclusive then?

Not for me, I love (mostly old) cars. I do however dislike the majority of drivers who are lazy, incompetent, dangerous and selfish and the way modern society is built around the car. If I won the lottery I'd buy a Ferrari 288 GTO, a 1968 Dodge Charger and a 1965 Jaguar Mark X as a start. They'd never actually go anywhere though because I don't have a drivers licence but they would look nice in my garage next to my bikes and a wall covered in Snap-On tools.

I also hate the way car manufacturers have lobbied to make the car king over the last 100 years and all the damage this has done to society, but I can't hate the millions of well paid unionised blue collar jobs the industry created.

I guess I'm in a dilemma when it comes to cars.

Avatar
mark1a replied to NOtotheEU | 12 months ago
4 likes

I understand where you are - I've had some  insane cars in the past, but now have 11 bikes and 1 van. Always wanted the Snap-On wall but have now converted my garage into a bike workshop with a Park Tool (other tools are available) wall. It's much cheaper, no need for lottery win (don't play, no need for my maths A level to work the odds out). I've got some dream bikes and don't miss the V8 M3 I sold in 2016 or the EV i3 I sold in 2017. The van fulfils my non-cycle travel needs (south and west Dorset, no public transport worth a mention and it's hilly here) and I do love it, it's lowered, remapped, body-kitted and I don't drive like a dick. So is this "car culture?" No. I love my van, and I love my bikes. If I lived in London/Bristol/Manchester/etc I'd just have bikes but it's not practical here. 

Avatar
NOtotheEU replied to mark1a | 12 months ago
3 likes

You have already won the garage lottery! 😄

Avatar
open_roads | 1 year ago
0 likes

I've paid the annual sub to get an Ad free experience but it's very unreliable.

If you are going to offer an ad free subscription product it needs to work.

My experience has been:

- the no-ad option expires every few weeks and has to be manually reset (login > go to account > tick "no ads")

- the login often doesn't activate the ad free option by default 

- repeated need for logins - the session seems to expire after a week or so

- the problem is repeated across FAT's websites i.e. it's (temporarily) working on road.cc then you click on a link and go to off-road.cc and it's no longer working and you have to fiddle with the account settings again.

I've tried clearing Road.cc... cookies etc from my browser and logging in again but after a week or so the same problems return.

Avatar
ktache | 1 year ago
5 likes

Before subscribing, I was always greatly amused by the (for me anyway) completely pointless car adverts, especially the more ridiculous and expensive ones.

I really hope you cashed in on those...

Avatar
jaymack | 1 year ago
1 like

Another thumbs up for the rideout's return.

Avatar
Sriracha | 1 year ago
2 likes

The thought of hunger stalking the corridors of Road.cc Towers has moved me to switching off my ad blocker. But I still get no ads. That's using the stock Samsung Internet app. Tried DuckDuckGo browser, no ads neither. Tried Firefox - I just get a sticky video - it's not even an ad but way more annoying. Finally I tried Chrome, from Google - surely the advertiser's friend? No dice. I'm stumped.

Avatar
andystow | 1 year ago
1 like

I like how bikepacking.com does swag giveaways, probably some ex-review items, some provided for the purpose by advertisers, to encourage people to subscribe.

 

Example:

https://bikepacking.com/news/spring-2023-collective-reward-winners/

Avatar
Tony Farrelly replied to andystow | 1 year ago
2 likes

We used to do those too back in the day… interesting idea though to make them subscriber only

Avatar
HollisJ replied to andystow | 1 year ago
1 like

Another possible event idea could be a big raffle sale based in Bath, where all subscribers are guaranteed to win something, with the grand prize being a bike. Good way to clean the cupboards and get people together.

A very good local bike shop (forever pedalling) has recently got into the event space with jumble sales and ride outs (I'm going on their gravel one in June).

Avatar
Flintshire Boy | 1 year ago
0 likes

.

Very interesting and informative.

.

Thank you.

.

Avatar
Miller | 1 year ago
0 likes

Offroad.cc appears to be off-line at the moment? For me anyway.

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to Miller | 1 year ago
1 like

Miller wrote:

Offroad.cc appears to be off-line at the moment? For me anyway.

If you're trying the links at the top of the webpage, they're not working for me. But the site is still there: https://off.road.cc/

Avatar
LookAhead | 1 year ago
1 like

How does road.cc make money?

By paying careful attention to detail, of course😉

Avatar
peted76 | 1 year ago
5 likes

Subcriber 'only' competitions might be a good incentive and an annoucement of competition winners might be nice too. 

I did a road.cc rideout once.. we had 50 odd turnout and it caused quite a buzz locally..  we have a new off-road trails opening this year at Newbold Comyn (Leamington).. it would be good place to start and finish a rideout from.

Maybe you could organise some popular route/area rides.. maybe an IoW rideout.. everyone loves the IoW and it'd make for a nice day trip for many. Or maybe a weekend with music and beer you could hire out one of those 'activity centres' for a weekend (y'know school trip style) and use it as a base for on and offroad rides.. the expectation being dorm room style or camping. 

What about a road.cc sportif (as in a proper paid for thing) some people have made a lot of money from those and I'm sure there is still some money to be made with a little thought, it amazes me how the continent can charge a third of the price as the UK. 

I liked the demo day I attended at Cannock, that was a very memorable day, I still speak of the eMTB riding which was just smile inducing. 

Avatar
Jack Sexty replied to peted76 | 1 year ago
2 likes

Cheers Pete, really valuable feedback and food for thought! We're definitely looking at doing a rideout again before the end of the year for starters, probably from our HQ in Bath. A weekend trip would be very cool. 

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
5 likes

I still suspect that it's somehow related to hiring out squirrels or repairing wing mirrors

Pages

Latest Comments